-
Home
-
Tables
-
Robots
-
Rackets
- Types
- Hardbat Rackets (without sponge)
- Entry Level Rackets - Pips-In w/Sponge
- Entry Level Rackets - Pips-Out w/Sponge
- Intermediate Recreational Rackets
- Advanced Recreational Rackets
- Penhold Recreational Rackets
- Penhold Pro Combos
- Offensive Pro Combos
- Allround Pro Combos
- Defensive Pro Combos
- Oversized Rackets
- Outdoor Rackets
- See also
- Balls
- Cases
- Cleaners
-
Blades
-
Rubber
-
Balls
-
Assembly
-
Apparel
-
Brands
- 729/Friendship
- Andro
- Barna
- Butterfly
- Cornilleau
- Der Materialspezialist
- DHS
- Donic
- Dr. Neubauer
- Falco
- Gambler
- Gewo
- Hallmark
- IPONG
- JOOLA
- Juic
- KETTLER
- MK
- Newgy
- Nittaku
- Paddle Palace
- PingPongBuddy
- Power Pong
- Practice Partner
- REvolution 3
- Sanwei
- Sauer & Troeger
- Sponeta
- STAG
- Stiga
- Tibhar
- TSP
- Victas
- XIOM
- Yasaka
-
Info
| Return to Topic Index |
This time ..planning service ban (12)
Re: This time ..planning service banby Fadil Olguner 17 years ago
The following message (subject: Re: This time ..planning service ban) was posted by Fadil Olguner, on 9/26/2008 8:15:38 PM:
| Hi Ben,today there was a team league match of my team.There I undersood that tt master Swing Back 1 F is more effective than Insider in terms of spin reversal.It was youth team matches and one of my students had been using Insider.He blocked the topspins of his opponent at least five or six times and his opponent was able to topspin again and again but my other student who was playing with Swing Back although he was playing with the same opponent ,he didn!t give chance to him to topspin more than two or three times.I know perhaps it is the way of blocking but Swing Back seemed to be more effective to me.They are both using the same blade Hallmark Combination.Anyway both rubbers are effective but of course they are not as effective as the old frictionless ones.Thanks |