-
Home
-
Tables
-
Robots
-
Rackets
- Types
- Hardbat Rackets (without sponge)
- Entry Level Rackets - Pips-In w/Sponge
- Entry Level Rackets - Pips-Out w/Sponge
- Intermediate Recreational Rackets
- Advanced Recreational Rackets
- Penhold Recreational Rackets
- Penhold Pro Combos
- Offensive Pro Combos
- Allround Pro Combos
- Defensive Pro Combos
- Oversized Rackets
- Outdoor Rackets
- See also
- Balls
- Cases
- Cleaners
-
Blades
-
Rubber
-
Balls
-
Assembly
-
Apparel
-
Brands
- 729/Friendship
- Andro
- Barna
- Butterfly
- Cornilleau
- Der Materialspezialist
- DHS
- Donic
- Dr. Neubauer
- Falco
- Gambler
- Gewo
- Hallmark
- IPONG
- JOOLA
- Juic
- KETTLER
- MK
- Newgy
- Nittaku
- Paddle Palace
- PingPongBuddy
- Power Pong
- Practice Partner
- REvolution 3
- Sanwei
- Sauer & Troeger
- Sponeta
- STAG
- Stiga
- Tibhar
- TSP
- Victas
- XIOM
- Yasaka
-
Info
| Return to Topic Index |
Insider,Swing Back IF and Frustration ban (31)
Re: Insider,Swing Back IF and Frustration banby JRSDallas 17 years ago
The following message (subject: Re: Insider,Swing Back IF and Frustration ban) was posted by JRSDallas, on 7/14/2008 5:21:19 AM:
| I find your conspiracy based logic to be interestingly based on a lack of logic. Tuners and boosters are chemical assistance. I thought I addressed this broad topic pretty well in my last post. My appologies if I did not name every variant of every chemical and how it might be applied in TT. The public doesn't distinguish between speed glues, boosters, or tuners. Has the ban been poorly administered and pursued...YES. Have manufacturers and players done their best to get around the ban test as a way of defeating the goals of the ban....YES. Has the ITTF been sloppy about the specific wording so that there is no opportunity for ambigous interpretation....YES. Has the intent of the ban been clear to objective observers.....YES. Are you an objective observer....NO. Did the manufactures submit samples for testing that were acurately representative of the production variation of each model of rubber sheet they were submitting for test...PROBABLY NOT. Did the manufactures intentionally submit rubbers that were selected to pass the frictionless test even though they knew the selected sheet did not represent a typical sheet of that model.....ONE CAN'T RULE IT OUT. Did everyone involved work together with high levels of communication so that everything would be clear and done right the first time....ABSOLUTELY NO. |