Return to Topic Index |
ratings (5)
ratings
by arthur 19 years ago
by arthur 19 years ago
Re: ratings
by Rick 19 years ago
by Rick 19 years ago
Re: ratings
by Pete 19 years ago
by Pete 19 years ago
Re: ratings
by Rick 19 years ago
by Rick 19 years ago
Re: ratings
by Ronald 19 years ago
by Ronald 19 years ago
Re: ratings
by Ronald 19 years ago
by Ronald 19 years ago
Re: ratings
by arthur 19 years ago
by arthur 19 years ago
Re: ratings
by dd 19 years ago
by dd 19 years ago
Re: ratings
by arthur redgate 19 years ago
by arthur redgate 19 years ago
Re: ratings
by Nick 19 years ago
by Nick 19 years ago
A sidenote to you other posters
by Nick 19 years ago
by Nick 19 years ago
Re: A sidenote to you other posters
by cole 19 years ago
by cole 19 years ago
Re: A sidenote to you other posters
by Nick 19 years ago
by Nick 19 years ago
The following message (subject: Re: ratings) was posted by Ronald, on 9/26/2005 6:40:44 PM:
I agree with Pete: if arthur's bobsled rating were 1500 (mph that is), that would mean something. But 1500 in table tennis? nope. Btw, below 1800, it's called "ping pong". |