-
Home
-
Tables
-
Robots
-
Rackets
- Types
- Hardbat Rackets (without sponge)
- Entry Level Rackets - Pips-In w/Sponge
- Entry Level Rackets - Pips-Out w/Sponge
- Intermediate Recreational Rackets
- Advanced Recreational Rackets
- Penhold Recreational Rackets
- Penhold Pro Combos
- Offensive Pro Combos
- Allround Pro Combos
- Defensive Pro Combos
- Outdoor Rackets
- See also
- Balls
-
Blades
-
Rubber
-
Balls
-
Assembly
- Gluing
- Glue
- Gluing Tools
- Side Tape
-
Gear
- Clothing and Shoes
- Shirts
- Women's Shirts
- Men's Shorts
- Women's Shorts
- Skirts
- Socks
- Caps
- Men's Suits
- Women's Suits
- Shoes
- See Also
- Cases
- Bags
- Other Accessories
-
Brands
- 729/Friendship
- Andro
- Barna
- Butterfly
- Cornilleau
- Der Materialspezialist
- DHS
- Donic
- Dr. Neubauer
- Falco
- Gambler
- Gewo
- Hallmark
- IPONG
- JOOLA
- Juic
- KETTLER
- MK
- Newgy
- Nittaku
- Paddle Palace
- PingPongBuddy
- Power Pong
- Practice Partner
- REvolution 3
- Sanwei
- Sauer & Troeger
- Sponeta
- STAG
- Stiga
- Tibhar
- TSP
- Victas
- XIOM
- Yasaka
-
Info
| Return to Topic Index |
ITTF AGAIN LATE (5)
Re: ITTF AGAIN LATEby GrepPP 16 years ago
The following message (subject: Re: ITTF AGAIN LATE) was posted by GrepPP, on 9/29/2008 9:18:06 PM:
| I am not sure of the procedure for getting the approval of a new rubber but in the case of the LP ban with the degree of friction on the rubber being the criteria for the ban, then the new rubbers approved after this should not be banned because the ITTF should not have approved it in the first place and if the these new approved rubbers are banned then that means a new set of rules have been implemented because these new rubbers were deemed to have passed the test(s). Maybe these companies should sue the ITTF because they have invested a lot of money in manufacturing the rubbers and many people have bought them so their reputation has been tarnished. |