Played 2.7 Black on Joola Zelebro, ZQH90, 5 ply rosewood, FZD ALC. Price is high. Spin potential is high. Needs sponge engagement and short stroke so this is rewarding to faster stroke players on harder/stiffer blades. Softer and slower blades allow for more gears and control on stronger shots and counters. I found it best to play on FH of FZD Alc.
Looping - requires sponge engagement- magic when it goes, hard to brush sometimes. Best oriented towards loop drivers like using fast arc g-1 or victas ventus. Easier to open than 09c and t05. Backspin doesnt have much impact on the rubber when you decide to topspin.
Counter- magic and plays fast and sharp and requires no major backswing to keep pace going. Better than t05 or d05 in that regard.
Short game- if you can only engage topsheet on short game, its very similar to fast arc g-1.
Serving- very similar to Chinese rubber if you can brush topsheet only. Ability to stay short is player depending but I found it easier than Dignics 05 on short game. 09c is slightly stronger on more aggressive short game like pushes or outright spin.
Major pros- great base speed and spin, good control for said speed and spin. Easy to punch and drive while allowing an ability to flip anything into topspin.
Major cons- extreme rebound on passive shots when someone is aggressive similar to hurricane rubbers. Beware sponge engagement on passive shots when someone else is giving strong spin and power.
Overall, an upgrade to g-1 style player with more spin speed and nearly same control. Also lighter at max thickness 157x150 blade at 2.7 max was 46.5 grams. Nearly 3-4 grams lighter than 09c of same thickness total.
-
Home
-
Tables
-
Robots
-
Rackets
- Types
- Hardbat Rackets (without sponge)
- Entry Level Rackets - Pips-In w/Sponge
- Entry Level Rackets - Pips-Out w/Sponge
- Intermediate Recreational Rackets
- Advanced Recreational Rackets
- Penhold Recreational Rackets
- Penhold Pro Combos
- Offensive Pro Combos
- Allround Pro Combos
- Defensive Pro Combos
- Oversized Rackets
- Outdoor Rackets
- See also
- Balls
- Cases
- Cleaners
-
Blades
-
Rubber
-
Balls
-
Assembly
-
Apparel
-
- 729/Friendship
- Andro
- Barna
- Butterfly
- Cornilleau
- Der Materialspezialist
- DHS
- Donic
- Dr. Neubauer
- Falco
- Gambler
- Gewo
- Hallmark
- IPONG
- JOOLA
- Juic
- KETTLER
- Maxi Pong
- MK
- Nittaku
- Paddle Palace
- PingPongBuddy
- Power Pong
- Practice Partner
- REvolution 3
- Sanwei
- Sauer & Troeger
- STAG
- Stiga
- Tibhar
- TSP
- Victas
- Vinqui
- XIOM
- Yasaka
-
→ High Spin Rubber → Butterfly Zyre-03
→ Butterfly Rubber Sheets → Butterfly Zyre-03
Butterfly Zyre-03
by Butterfly
Read our detailed review:
Butterfly Zyre-03 Detailed Review
Redefine the Shape of Strength
• Developed with a low-profile, high-density pimple structure
• Composed of “Ricosheet” - a top sheet with dense, low pimples, and an extremely thick sponge
• A top sheet compound with strengthened resistance to abrasion
• Excellent feeling of holding the ball
• Recommended for players who wish to dominate rallies with powerful, spin-heavy shots
Developed from an unprecedented perspective, with a low-profile, high-density pimple structure. The result of this bold innovation - spin like never before.
Lifting the trajectory higher, driving it deeper, elevating the quality of both finishing shots and rally control. Shots transform, new tactics emerge, the path of growth expands.
This is where strength takes a new shape.
The Zyre rubber is composed of “Ricosheet”, a top sheet with dense, low pimples, and an extremely thick sponge. In addition to this distinctive structure, this rubber has a top sheet compound with strengthened resistance to abrasion, an excellent feeling of holding the ball, and a harder Spring Sponge X. Adopting pimple code No. 303 which draws out power with spin, Zyre-03 enables shots that penetrate deep into the opponent’s side of the table with a dramatic arced trajectory. This is recommended for players who wish to dominate rallies with powerful, spin-heavy shots.
Surface: High Tension pimples-in [Spring Sponge X, Ricosheet]
Speed: 88
Spin: 100
Arc: 96
Hardness: 44
Butterfly Rubber Comparison Chart (updated September 2025 to include Zyre-03)
Rubber Buying Guide - what you need to know when buying rubber sheets.
Compare rubber ratings - compare ratings to other sheets.
Best Price Guarantee
We guarantee to have the lowest prices (shipping included) in the US. Please tell us if you see a lower price.
Related Products
Customers who purchased Butterfly Zyre-03 also purchased:
Reviews of Butterfly Zyre-03 (20)
I tested a black ZYRE-03 on a Butterfly Franziska Innerforce ZLC, with Dignics 80 on the other side. That gave me a useful direct comparison on the same blade.
My first thought was rather unexpected: this feels like a Tenergy 25 on steroids. The throw angle is extremely high. The difference is that, while Tenergy 25 always felt somewhat sluggish to me and was mainly suited to aggressive close-to-the-table play, ZYRE-03 has the speed of a modern high-performance tensor. It has enough power to play from mid-distance without feeling limited.
The catapult is extremely strong, but also surprisingly consistent. Rather than wondering when it will kick in, I feel that it is practically always there. In that sense, the rubber is more predictable than I expected.
Unfortunately, predictable catapult does not automatically mean easy control. ZYRE-03 has an extremely demanding throw angle and is very sensitive to both racket angle and incoming spin. The ball seems to leave the racket immediately, so there is very little room to correct a less-than-perfect contact.
The difference was obvious when I first tried the setup. I started on the Dignics 80 side, looping and counterlooping comfortably without mistakes. Then I turned the racket around to ZYRE-03, and my first counterloops went roughly a metre (3feet) beyond the table. That is how dramatic the adjustment felt to me.
I have said before that Tenergy 05 requires good technique and high-quality contact. For my level, I would describe that as needing something like an 80% quality stroke to execute the more difficult attacks reliably. With ZYRE-03, it feels closer to 95%. Of course these are not measurements; they are my way of describing how narrow the margin for error feels. You almost have to execute textbook strokes every single time. Its speed and spin potential are remarkable, but the rubber seems to amplify mistakes just as efficiently as it amplifies good strokes.
My first thought was rather unexpected: this feels like a Tenergy 25 on steroids. The throw angle is extremely high. The difference is that, while Tenergy 25 always felt somewhat sluggish to me and was mainly suited to aggressive close-to-the-table play, ZYRE-03 has the speed of a modern high-performance tensor. It has enough power to play from mid-distance without feeling limited.
The catapult is extremely strong, but also surprisingly consistent. Rather than wondering when it will kick in, I feel that it is practically always there. In that sense, the rubber is more predictable than I expected.
Unfortunately, predictable catapult does not automatically mean easy control. ZYRE-03 has an extremely demanding throw angle and is very sensitive to both racket angle and incoming spin. The ball seems to leave the racket immediately, so there is very little room to correct a less-than-perfect contact.
The difference was obvious when I first tried the setup. I started on the Dignics 80 side, looping and counterlooping comfortably without mistakes. Then I turned the racket around to ZYRE-03, and my first counterloops went roughly a metre (3feet) beyond the table. That is how dramatic the adjustment felt to me.
I have said before that Tenergy 05 requires good technique and high-quality contact. For my level, I would describe that as needing something like an 80% quality stroke to execute the more difficult attacks reliably. With ZYRE-03, it feels closer to 95%. Of course these are not measurements; they are my way of describing how narrow the margin for error feels. You almost have to execute textbook strokes every single time. Its speed and spin potential are remarkable, but the rubber seems to amplify mistakes just as efficiently as it amplifies good strokes.
Zyre 03 First Impressions (Summary)
Setup: Yasaka Atletico Spin Pro with Zyre 03 (2.7 mm FH / 2.5 mm BH), previously using Xuperman Powerplay-X.
Service: Similar to the Powerplay-X. Allows short or long serves with great spin without major adjustments. Very comfortable feel.
Service Receive: A bit more bouncy. Requires attention to racket angle and a relaxed grip. On very short balls, a lazy touch makes the ball fly off fast.
Forehand: The highlight of the test! Accessible speed, great spin generation, and high confidence for attacking or blocking without fear of going long. Good comfort and power from mid-distance when putting effort into the stroke. (Note: Not a magic rubber; shot quality depends entirely on your technique and power).
Backhand: Needed a slight adjustment. I tend to lift the ball; with the Zyre 03, it went too high until I closed the racket angle and hit more forward. Afterward, it delivered great speed, spin, and attacking confidence.
Thickness (2.7 mm vs 2.5 mm): Haven't swapped them yet, so I cannot compare the differences between the two thicknesses just yet.
Overall Feeling: Surprisingly natural and soft despite its hard sponge. Very comfortable from the first session with no slipping issues on the blade.
Durability: Too early to report (only 2 hours of testing so far).
Setup: Yasaka Atletico Spin Pro with Zyre 03 (2.7 mm FH / 2.5 mm BH), previously using Xuperman Powerplay-X.
Service: Similar to the Powerplay-X. Allows short or long serves with great spin without major adjustments. Very comfortable feel.
Service Receive: A bit more bouncy. Requires attention to racket angle and a relaxed grip. On very short balls, a lazy touch makes the ball fly off fast.
Forehand: The highlight of the test! Accessible speed, great spin generation, and high confidence for attacking or blocking without fear of going long. Good comfort and power from mid-distance when putting effort into the stroke. (Note: Not a magic rubber; shot quality depends entirely on your technique and power).
Backhand: Needed a slight adjustment. I tend to lift the ball; with the Zyre 03, it went too high until I closed the racket angle and hit more forward. Afterward, it delivered great speed, spin, and attacking confidence.
Thickness (2.7 mm vs 2.5 mm): Haven't swapped them yet, so I cannot compare the differences between the two thicknesses just yet.
Overall Feeling: Surprisingly natural and soft despite its hard sponge. Very comfortable from the first session with no slipping issues on the blade.
Durability: Too early to report (only 2 hours of testing so far).
very forgiving rubber for forehand, super long dwell time and not very sensitive when blocking.
Ive been using the Zyre 03 2.5mm for backhand (Red) for a while now. I am a technical player and play various aggressive backhands style/techniques. This is a fast rubber so you must have the ability to combine force and friction to compress the sponge to create dwell time/grip as this rubber is not tacky to do that for you (note this is an advanced/pro skill - most club/amateurs struggle). Without this ability, you will not be able to realise the true rubber advantages and is useless for you. This rubber is amazing for backhand blocking and fast banana flicks. The Zyre 03 topsheet is very smooth (non tacky) and it is durable as advertised - after nearly several months of use the topsheet still looks new (like the G1) an advantage if you want to have this as a long term rubber.
I have tested the 2.5mm Zyre 03 with the Nittaku Fastarc G1 (2mm) as I have this as my FH rubber to compare - my findings (feeling) with complete forehand loops and forehand drive strokes, Nittaku G1 offers noticeably more in terms of spin, arc, power due to its better and grippier topsheet - and it still plays very very similar to the Zyre 03. Both excels in the close to mid distance and are both lightweight.
Cut Weight:
2.5mm Zyre 03 = 45G
2.0mm Super thick Nittaku G1 = 46G
Of course I am using the 2.5mm version, not the 2.7mm. But I firmly believe the MAX thickness size Nittaku G1 would play better than 2.7mm Zyre 03 in topspin to topspin rallies ect and do what the Zyre 03 is capable of.
This is an honest review and made this review only using full strokes and techniques. Do not fall for marketing tactics that aim to make it seem like this is the best rubber out there - as there are better comparable/similar products.
This rubber is designed for top level game as it is changing drastically with players playing faster, stronger Back Hands and closer to table - without proper technique and power this rubber is honestly 8.6/10.
I have tested the 2.5mm Zyre 03 with the Nittaku Fastarc G1 (2mm) as I have this as my FH rubber to compare - my findings (feeling) with complete forehand loops and forehand drive strokes, Nittaku G1 offers noticeably more in terms of spin, arc, power due to its better and grippier topsheet - and it still plays very very similar to the Zyre 03. Both excels in the close to mid distance and are both lightweight.
Cut Weight:
2.5mm Zyre 03 = 45G
2.0mm Super thick Nittaku G1 = 46G
Of course I am using the 2.5mm version, not the 2.7mm. But I firmly believe the MAX thickness size Nittaku G1 would play better than 2.7mm Zyre 03 in topspin to topspin rallies ect and do what the Zyre 03 is capable of.
This is an honest review and made this review only using full strokes and techniques. Do not fall for marketing tactics that aim to make it seem like this is the best rubber out there - as there are better comparable/similar products.
This rubber is designed for top level game as it is changing drastically with players playing faster, stronger Back Hands and closer to table - without proper technique and power this rubber is honestly 8.6/10.
Butterfly Rubber
Table Tennis Rubber
All items are in stock unless otherwise stated. All prices are in USD.
If you need help or advice please contact us. We are happy to help!