Not a fan of dyneema carbon but if i had to play with it, I would choose the Dynamic JC. Good control, amazing block, very fast for and innerforce, a bit too stiff for my backhand topspin but with training and price performance I found it really good.
-
Home
-
Tables
-
Robots
-
Rackets
- Types
- Hardbat Rackets (without sponge)
- Entry Level Rackets - Pips-In w/Sponge
- Entry Level Rackets - Pips-Out w/Sponge
- Intermediate Recreational Rackets
- Advanced Recreational Rackets
- Penhold Recreational Rackets
- Penhold Pro Combos
- Offensive Pro Combos
- Allround Pro Combos
- Defensive Pro Combos
- Outdoor Rackets
- See also
- Balls
-
Blades
-
Rubber
-
Balls
-
Assembly
- Gluing
- Glue
- Gluing Tools
- Side Tape
-
Gear
- Clothing and Shoes
- Shirts
- Women's Shirts
- Men's Shorts
- Women's Shorts
- Skirts
- Socks
- Caps
- Men's Suits
- Women's Suits
- Shoes
- See Also
- Cases
- Bags
- Other Accessories
-
Brands
-
Info
→ Offensive Blades → Tibhar Dynamic JC
→ Tibhar Blades → Tibhar Dynamic JC
Tibhar Dynamic JC
by Tibhar
This new blade by Darko Jorgic – Tibhar Dynamic JC – uses the Dyneema® carbon fiber. Consisting of 5 wood plies and 2 layers of Dyneema® carbon fibers, Dynamic JC confers enormous power and penetrating force to your topspin strokes. Since the Dyneema® carbon fibers do not lie directly underneath the top veneer, the touch feeling is not only determined by the Dyneema® fiber. Power, control and flexibility are the main qualities of the Tibhar Dynamic JC, but also of Darko‘s playing style! Class: OFF
Speed: 91
Control: 72
Weight: 85g
Material: Wood + Composite
Blade Buying Guide - what you need to know when buying a blade.
Compare Blades - blade rating comparison chart.
Blade Weight Variations - Actual blade weight may vary by up to 8g.
Best Price Guarantee
We guarantee to have the lowest prices (shipping included) in the US. Please tell us if you see a lower price.
Reviews of Tibhar Dynamic JC (7)
The blade is really light, 80g. Nonetheless, it feels very crisp and offers a lot of power, but it is still possible to have great control. With Rasanter R45 and Victas V01 Limber it works great. Compared to Nittaku Ma Long 5 and Butterfly Harimoto ALC and to Viscaria it produces really good spin, too. I like it very much.
I was looking for a blade similar to HL5 but with AN handle. This Tibhar Dynamic JC isn't exactly the same (it's a little faster and less vibrations) but the control is similar. Handle is on the large side although Tibhar offers even wider handles on some blades (Stratus and Nimbus series are good for very large hands for example). It works well with hard ESN rubbers like MX-D, Dynaryz ZGR, Omega VII Tour, but also with tacky rubbers like H3.
Dynamic JC is similar to Fortino Pro DC inside, they have the same composition and behave in a similar way, but Fortino is more expensive, which can be explained by a better finish (made in Germany) and less sample variation (better QC). But JC has a cooler design. I own both.
Anyway, this Dynamic JC is very pleasant to use, well balanced and it offers good speed, good spin and good control at the same time, without being too expensive. Great QPR and really underrated (poor communication by Tibhar maybe).
Dynamic JC is similar to Fortino Pro DC inside, they have the same composition and behave in a similar way, but Fortino is more expensive, which can be explained by a better finish (made in Germany) and less sample variation (better QC). But JC has a cooler design. I own both.
Anyway, this Dynamic JC is very pleasant to use, well balanced and it offers good speed, good spin and good control at the same time, without being too expensive. Great QPR and really underrated (poor communication by Tibhar maybe).
I have 2 of them... and they are completely different. First a ST handle at 79 gr. Sounds as reviewers describe. Very hollow sound, like a bell. Above1500Hz.
Feels springy, very fast but linear (off to off+), like not having a lot of dwell, feels not very spinny.
Yet it has more spin, more control than you expected. (BTY D05 max both sides). A fast, direct, stiff, not too hard topspin machine close to the table. Very dangerous, yet more control than you'd expect - no beginners blade. Excellent fast blocks. Very stable and consitant. I liked it, so I bought a second one, FL handle, 81 gr. And was disappointed - at first. No hollow bell sound. Much lower frequency (approx. 1300Hz, MUCH lower than the other JC much lower than TB ALC).
First both sides BTY D5 again, then I slapped DHS H3 nat blue 40 deg. (tuned) on forehand and DHS H3 nat orange 37 deg. (tuned) on it. Plays like a more stable, more linear BTY IF layer ALC. Speed off-, stiff but soft feeling, VERY high spin, lots of dwell, lots of control in matches. Plays better in matches than in drill. Blocking in drills is doable, but not funny. Blocking in matches: the higher the incoming energy and the higher the incoming spin, the better it blocks. Produces surprising speed, very high spin, but can also take all energy out, and take all spin out of the ball. Best chop-blocks. Widest range of gears. It gives you a feeling of control in matches resulting in the fact, that i play more agressively.
Both very good, but very different - i have never experienced that two equal blades (even similar weight), play so differently - production consistency?.
So I give two scores. The scores refer to the same rubbers, I tried H3 / D5 on both.
ST handle: speed 9.5, control 9 (for advanced payers), stiffness: stiff, hardness: medium hard, consistency 10, catapult: medium high.
FL handle: speed 8.5, control 9.5, stiffness: stiff, hardness: medium soft, consistency 10, catapult: medium low
Feels springy, very fast but linear (off to off+), like not having a lot of dwell, feels not very spinny.
Yet it has more spin, more control than you expected. (BTY D05 max both sides). A fast, direct, stiff, not too hard topspin machine close to the table. Very dangerous, yet more control than you'd expect - no beginners blade. Excellent fast blocks. Very stable and consitant. I liked it, so I bought a second one, FL handle, 81 gr. And was disappointed - at first. No hollow bell sound. Much lower frequency (approx. 1300Hz, MUCH lower than the other JC much lower than TB ALC).
First both sides BTY D5 again, then I slapped DHS H3 nat blue 40 deg. (tuned) on forehand and DHS H3 nat orange 37 deg. (tuned) on it. Plays like a more stable, more linear BTY IF layer ALC. Speed off-, stiff but soft feeling, VERY high spin, lots of dwell, lots of control in matches. Plays better in matches than in drill. Blocking in drills is doable, but not funny. Blocking in matches: the higher the incoming energy and the higher the incoming spin, the better it blocks. Produces surprising speed, very high spin, but can also take all energy out, and take all spin out of the ball. Best chop-blocks. Widest range of gears. It gives you a feeling of control in matches resulting in the fact, that i play more agressively.
Both very good, but very different - i have never experienced that two equal blades (even similar weight), play so differently - production consistency?.
So I give two scores. The scores refer to the same rubbers, I tried H3 / D5 on both.
ST handle: speed 9.5, control 9 (for advanced payers), stiffness: stiff, hardness: medium hard, consistency 10, catapult: medium high.
FL handle: speed 8.5, control 9.5, stiffness: stiff, hardness: medium soft, consistency 10, catapult: medium low
Great soft feeling and long dwell time, it is near compare to Timo Boll ZLC if we talk about pop shots. The speed is near to Timo Boll ZLF so it is easier to play softer shots. The Grip is perfect for backhand so for me it is combination of Timo Boll ZLC which was used by Darko and control of ZLF. Really good material and really good choice for aggressive players who plays close to the table.
Tibhar Blades
Table Tennis Blades
All items are in stock unless otherwise stated. All prices are in USD.
If you need help or advice please contact us. We are happy to help!